# multi-swe-bench / cli__cli9465 - taskset: [multi-swe-bench](https://harnessreport.com/tasks/multi-swe-bench.md) - difficulty: hard - category: software-development - language: - runnable from the site: no - agent timeout: 14400s ## Results by harness _none yet_ ## Instruction ``` <uploaded_files> /workspace/cli </uploaded_files> I've uploaded a Go code repository in the directory /workspace/cli. Consider the following issue description: <issue_description> # Remove `Internal` from `gh repo create` prompt when owner is not an org Fixes #9464 Internal repos only exist for organizations, so when a user selects their personal namespace to create a repo using `gh repo create`, `Internal` should not be an option in the `Visibility` prompt. This should avoid the additional quirk where if the user selects `Internal` while creating a personal repo and then proceeds to add any of the README, .gitignore, or LICENSE files prompted for later, the repo will not error and instead get created as a `Public` repo. This has the potential for a user to unknowingly leak sensitive info intended to go into a non-public repo. ## Screenshots ### Visibility prompt when creating a personal repo <img width="617" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 3 26 37 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2a263826-e7e6-4721-8a11-f760a5f5f29a"> ### Visibility prompt when creating an org repo <img width="620" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 3 26 14 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3e93dc7b-f058-46d2-8e45-9fc40d8cdebc"> ## To test 1. Pull down branch `gh pr checkout 9465` 2. Build the tool in the root directory: `make` 3. Try the prompt, selecting your personal account: `bin/gh repo create` ## Repository Information - **Repository**: cli/cli - **Pull Request**: #9465 - **Base Commit**: `c81ccab4b8bb1ef1c774f4ba9851e9dcb11fa5e7` ## Related Issues - https://github.com/cli/cli/issues/9464 </issue_description> Can you help me implement the necessary changes to the repository so that the requirements specified in the <issue_description> are met? I've already taken care of all changes to any of the test files described in the <issue_description>. This means you DON'T have to modify the testing logic or any of the tests in any way! Also the development Go environment is already set up for you (i.e., all dependencies already installed), so you don't need to install other packages. Your task is to make the minimal changes to non-test files in the /workspace/cli directory to ensure the <issue_description> is satisfied. Follow these phases to resolve the issue: Phase 1. READING: read the problem and reword it in clearer terms 1.1 If there are code or config snippets. Express in words any best practices or conventions in them. 1.2 Highlight message errors, method names, variables, file names, stack traces, and technical details. 1.3 Explain the problem in clear terms. 1.4 Enumerate the steps to reproduce the problem. 1.5 Highlight any best practices to take into account when testing and fixing the issue. Phase 2. RUNNING: install and run the tests on the repository 2.1 Follow the readme. 2.2 Install the environment and anything needed. 2.3 Iterate and figure out how to run the tests. Phase 3. EXPLORATION: find the files that are related to the problem and possible solutions 3.1 Use `grep` to search for relevant methods, classes, keywords and error messages. 3.2 Identify all files related to the problem statement. 3.3 Propose the methods and files to fix the issue and explain why. 3.4 From the possible file locations, select the most likely location to fix the issue. Phase 4. TEST CREATION: before implementing any fix, create a script to reproduce and verify the issue 4.1 Look at existing test files in the repository to understand the test format/structure. 4.2 Create a minimal reproduction script that reproduces the located issue. 4.3 Run the reproduction script with `go run <filename.go>` to confirm you are reproducing the issue. 4.4 Adjust the reproduction script as necessary. Phase 5. FIX ANALYSIS: state clearly the problem and how to fix it 5.1 State clearly what the problem is. 5.2 State clearly where the problem is located. 5.3 State clearly how the test reproduces the issue. 5.4 State clearly the best practices to take into account in the fix. 5.5 State clearly how to fix the problem. Phase 6. FIX IMPLEMENTATION: Edit the source code to implement your chosen solution. 6.1 Make minimal, focused changes to fix the issue. Phase 7. VERIFICATION: Test your implementation thoroughly. 7.1 Run your reproduction script to verify the fix works. 7.2 Add edge cases to your test script to ensure comprehensive coverage. 7.3 Run existing tests related to the modified code with `go test ./...` to ensure you haven't broken anything. Phase 8. FINAL REVIEW: Carefully re-read the problem description and compare your changes with the base commit c81ccab4b8bb1ef1c774f4ba9851e9dcb11fa5e7. 8.1 Ensure you've fully addressed all requirements. 8.2 Run any tests in the repository related to: 8.2.1 The issue you are fixing 8.2.2 The files you modified 8.2.3 The functions you changed 8.3 If any tests fail, revise your implementation until all tests pass. Be thorough in your exploration, testing, and reasoning. It's fine if your thinking process is lengthy - quality and completeness are more important than brevity. IMPORTANT CONSTRAINTS: - ONLY modify files within the /workspace/cli directory - DO NOT navigate outside this directory (no `cd ..` or absolute paths to other locations) - DO NOT create, modify, or delete any files outside the repository - All your changes must be trackable by `git diff` within the repository - If you need to create test files, create them inside the repository directory ``` --- Harness Report runs agent harnesses from their GitHub repos on Harbor tasks and records every model call. Every page is also `.md` and `.json`; index: https://harnessreport.com/llms.txt · MCP: https://harnessreport.com/mcp