# multi-swe-bench / cli__cli10362 - taskset: [multi-swe-bench](https://harnessreport.com/tasks/multi-swe-bench.md) - difficulty: hard - category: software-development - language: - runnable from the site: no - agent timeout: 14400s ## Results by harness _none yet_ ## Instruction ``` <uploaded_files> /workspace/cli </uploaded_files> I've uploaded a Go code repository in the directory /workspace/cli. Consider the following issue description: <issue_description> # feat: Add support for deleting autolink references Fixes #10120 Introduces the `gh repo autolink delete <id>` subcommand. ## Deviation from Spec The linked issue specifies deletion by key prefix, not ID, which is what I've implemented here. Because the REST API does not support accessing autolinks by key prefix, we decided to build the CLI wrapper for viewing autolinks with ID, not key prefix, as the argument (see the bottom of [this comment](https://github.com/cli/cli/issues/10200#issuecomment-2581207451)). For consistency's sake, I've extended that decision to the deletion case, as I proposed [here](https://github.com/cli/cli/issues/10120#issuecomment-2621519727). We require a confirmation step for deletion, and our confirmation flow presents the user with a string to type in to confirm deletion. The key prefix of the autolink to be deleted is the natural fit for this string, and this is what the spec requires. To achieve this behavior, we fetch the autolink by ID to learn its key prefix, then use that value to prompt the user for confirmation. We can—and I believe we should—follow up with an enhancement to allow viewing and deletion by either ID or key prefix. ## Examples ### Succesful Delete #### Confirmation Step ``` $ ./bin/gh repo autolink delete 7196774 --repo nytimes/games-dsr Autolink 7196774 has key prefix TEST-. ? Type TEST- to confirm deletion: ``` #### Confirmation Failure ``` $ ./bin/gh repo autolink delete 7196774 --repo nytimes/games-dsr Autolink 7196774 has key prefix TEST-. X Sorry, your reply was invalid: You entered foo ? Type TEST- to confirm deletion: ``` #### Confirmation Success ``` $ ./bin/gh repo autolink delete 7196774 --repo nytimes/games-dsr Autolink 7196774 has key prefix TEST-. X Sorry, your reply was invalid: You entered foo ✓ Autolink 7196774 deleted from nytimes/games-dsr ``` ### Delete, Skip Confirmation ``` $ ./bin/gh repo autolink delete 7204166 --yes --repo nytimes/games-dsr ✓ Autolink 7204166 deleted from nytimes/games-dsr ``` ### 404 (repo or autolink not found or no admin access) ``` ./bin/gh repo autolink delete 123 error deleting autolink: HTTP 404: Perhaps you are missing admin rights to the repository? (https://api.github.com/repos/cli/cli/autolinks/123) ``` ### Missing Argument ``` $ ./bin/gh repo autolink delete accepts 1 arg(s), received 0 ``` ## Additional Changes In addition to the work described above, I've included some small changes for the sake of consistency within the `gh repo autolink` subcommands, including: * Bold repo names. * Standardize 404 message to: "Perhaps you are missing admin rights to the repository?" * Use `http` constants for status codes in tests. * Fix var names where "autolink" is treated as two words, e.g. `AutoLink` -> "Auolink". ## Repository Information - **Repository**: cli/cli - **Pull Request**: #10362 - **Base Commit**: `0a05012ca6d6afc95f4d4ab63be0ceb0d99dfe0c` ## Related Issues - https://github.com/cli/cli/issues/10120 </issue_description> Can you help me implement the necessary changes to the repository so that the requirements specified in the <issue_description> are met? I've already taken care of all changes to any of the test files described in the <issue_description>. This means you DON'T have to modify the testing logic or any of the tests in any way! Also the development Go environment is already set up for you (i.e., all dependencies already installed), so you don't need to install other packages. Your task is to make the minimal changes to non-test files in the /workspace/cli directory to ensure the <issue_description> is satisfied. Follow these phases to resolve the issue: Phase 1. READING: read the problem and reword it in clearer terms 1.1 If there are code or config snippets. Express in words any best practices or conventions in them. 1.2 Highlight message errors, method names, variables, file names, stack traces, and technical details. 1.3 Explain the problem in clear terms. 1.4 Enumerate the steps to reproduce the problem. 1.5 Highlight any best practices to take into account when testing and fixing the issue. Phase 2. RUNNING: install and run the tests on the repository 2.1 Follow the readme. 2.2 Install the environment and anything needed. 2.3 Iterate and figure out how to run the tests. Phase 3. EXPLORATION: find the files that are related to the problem and possible solutions 3.1 Use `grep` to search for relevant methods, classes, keywords and error messages. 3.2 Identify all files related to the problem statement. 3.3 Propose the methods and files to fix the issue and explain why. 3.4 From the possible file locations, select the most likely location to fix the issue. Phase 4. TEST CREATION: before implementing any fix, create a script to reproduce and verify the issue 4.1 Look at existing test files in the repository to understand the test format/structure. 4.2 Create a minimal reproduction script that reproduces the located issue. 4.3 Run the reproduction script with `go run <filename.go>` to confirm you are reproducing the issue. 4.4 Adjust the reproduction script as necessary. Phase 5. FIX ANALYSIS: state clearly the problem and how to fix it 5.1 State clearly what the problem is. 5.2 State clearly where the problem is located. 5.3 State clearly how the test reproduces the issue. 5.4 State clearly the best practices to take into account in the fix. 5.5 State clearly how to fix the problem. Phase 6. FIX IMPLEMENTATION: Edit the source code to implement your chosen solution. 6.1 Make minimal, focused changes to fix the issue. Phase 7. VERIFICATION: Test your implementation thoroughly. 7.1 Run your reproduction script to verify the fix works. 7.2 Add edge cases to your test script to ensure comprehensive coverage. 7.3 Run existing tests related to the modified code with `go test ./...` to ensure you haven't broken anything. Phase 8. FINAL REVIEW: Carefully re-read the problem description and compare your changes with the base commit 0a05012ca6d6afc95f4d4ab63be0ceb0d99dfe0c. 8.1 Ensure you've fully addressed all requirements. 8.2 Run any tests in the repository related to: 8.2.1 The issue you are fixing 8.2.2 The files you modified 8.2.3 The functions you changed 8.3 If any tests fail, revise your implementation until all tests pass. Be thorough in your exploration, testing, and reasoning. It's fine if your thinking process is lengthy - quality and completeness are more important than brevity. IMPORTANT CONSTRAINTS: - ONLY modify files within the /workspace/cli directory - DO NOT navigate outside this directory (no `cd ..` or absolute paths to other locations) - DO NOT create, modify, or delete any files outside the repository - All your changes must be trackable by `git diff` within the repository - If you need to create test files, create them inside the repository directory ``` --- Harness Report runs agent harnesses from their GitHub repos on Harbor tasks and records every model call. Every page is also `.md` and `.json`; index: https://harnessreport.com/llms.txt · MCP: https://harnessreport.com/mcp