{"task": {"agent_timeout": 3000, "task": "codegen__jaegertracing__jaeger-6116", "verifier_timeout": 3000, "instruction": "This is a code generation task. You are expected to write working code that solves the described problem.\n\n ### What happened?\n\nAs an SRE deploying Jaeger at a medium-sized engineering organization (the Wikimedia Foundation), I want to enable trace archival support, for the usual benefits discussed in #57: \n> Users often ask for this feature. The trace retention period is usually short, and often people would put a link to the trace into some issue tracker to improve service performance, but by the time someone starts working on the ticket the trace has already expired.\n\nHowever, spans are written to our Elasticsearch(/OpenSearch) archival storage regardless of whether or not they already exist. When archived traces are read from archival storage and displayed, this leads to spans that are duplicated exponentially by however many times 'archive' was clicked.\n![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2006a9b2-7728-4744-9dd6-da346ee78850)\n\n\nWe're running Jaeger on Kubernetes using a slight modification of the official Helm chart (if curious see [chart](https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/plugins/gitiles/operations/deployment-charts/+/refs/heads/master/charts/jaeger/) and [values](https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/plugins/gitiles/operations/deployment-charts/+/refs/heads/master/helmfile.d/aux-k8s-services/jaeger/values.yaml))\n\n\n### Steps to reproduce\n\n1. Configure jaeger + OpenSearch similar to ours, with archive tracing\n2. Send some tracing data\n3. Archive the trace\n4. Archive the trace again\n5. Restart jaeger-query with `--es.max-span-age` younger than the trace is\n6. Refresh the UI page for the trace\n\n### Expected behavior\n\nPressing the 'archive' button on a trace that already exists in archive storage would not mutate anything in archive storage.\n\n### Relevant log output\n\n_No response_\n\n\n### Screenshot\n\n![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2006a9b2-7728-4744-9dd6-da346ee78850)\nWhen expanded, the SpanIDs for these traces show as:\n* 8d3589e43d599843\n* 8d3589e43d599843_1\n* 8d3589e43d599843_2\n* 8d3589e43d599843_3\nAll child spans are similarly duplicated.\n\nIf you examine the OpenSearch index directly, you find that the spans are duplicate documents with everything identical except the index-internal `_id` field:\n![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/abcdd653-46f7-41c4-83d8-f3371112a5cd)\n\n### Additional context\n\n_No response_\n\n### Jaeger backend version\n\nv1.56.0\n\n### SDK\n\nEnvoy sending OpenTelemetry\n\n### Pipeline\n\nEnvoy -> otelcol -> jaeger-collector\n\n### Stogage backend\n\nOpenSearch 2.7.0\n\n### Operating system\n\nLinux\n\n### Deployment model\n\nKubernetes\n\n### Deployment configs\n\n```shell\nArgs: \n --es-archive.enabled=true \n --es-archive.index-date-separator=. \n --es-archive.num-replicas=2 \n --es-archive.num-shards=1 \n --es-archive.tags-as-fields.all=true \n --es-archive.tls.enabled=true \n --es.index-date-separator=. \n --es.max-span-age=756h0m0s \n --es.num-replicas=2 \n --es.num-shards=1 \n --es.tags-as-fields.all=true \n --es.tls.enabled=true\n[...]\n Environment: \n SPAN_STORAGE_TYPE: elasticsearch \n ES_SERVER_URLS: https://logs-api.svc.eqiad.wmnet:443 \n ES_USERNAME: jaeger-prod \n ES_PASSWORD: Optional: false \n ES_ARCHIVE_SERVER_URLS: https://logs-api.svc.eqiad.wmnet:443 \n ES_ARCHIVE_USERNAME: jaeger-prod \n ES_ARCHIVE_PASSWORD: Optional: false \n QUERY_BASE_PATH: /\n```\n\n\nFocus on implementing the required functionality correctly and efficiently. Treat this as a programming challenge.\nYou are not allowed to read git history.\n", "memory": "8192m", "runnable": false, "difficulty": "hard", "language": "", "cpus": "", "instruction_truncated": false, "category": "code-generation", "compose": false, "has_solution": true, "oracle": null, "docker_image": "", "taskset": "devopsgym", "tags": ["code-generation", "devops-bench"]}, "runs": []}